133 Dalmeny Drive, Prestons NSW 2170, Australia +612-96074650 & 0412-203382

  JLTi Oppo Player        CD & DVD Player Upgrades        JLTi Tube Amps   

Home
World-Wide Distributors
JLTi BDP Oppo Player
Oppo Level 3 Details
JLTi Phono - Back Again
JLTi EL34 & KT88 Amps
JLTi Yamaha CD/SACD
What is Terra Firma?
CD/DVD Upgrades FAQ
Contact Us
Elsinore Speakers DIY
Elsinore Project Kits
JLTi EL34 Wins Shootut
About Joe Rasmussen
JLTi Interconnects
JLTi Review & Comment
Tubes & The Gainclones
DIY Tube Gainclone
Joe's FVP Page
Joe's Equipment Photos
Fletcher-Munson Curves
Joe's Photos
TODAY'S SPECIALS
Real Vs False Claims?

 

The Critical Q Sub-Woofer

Acoustic Measurements (Clio) Page

 

 

 
These are 1/6th Octave RTA Measurements: The Blue is Frequency Knob at Maximum and Brown is Centre and Red is the Minimum Position. Please note carefully, the are nearfield measurements and thus represents the 2Pi response. This is not the Room Response you will get at the listening position. The fact that the response does not look flat down to 20 Hertz, it will in room.
 
The reason why this flat response is attained is when you superimpose the Room Response curve below. That shows that a Sub should not have a flat 2Pi response.
 
 
Here is an example where the Sub has been inserted into a system:
 
Now this may not exactly look all that impressive, but it is deceiving. This is the actual Frequency Response at the listener's position. So it includes everything. It is not the Frequency Response of the speakers. It includes all room modes, otherwise the response would be much flatter.
 
This is 1/6th RTA, which is four times the resolution of the usual 1/3rd RTA that you see everywhere. Consequently it is a more severe and detailed measurement.
 
But note, the overall response is flat down to 20 Hertz in room!

Distortion & Sine Wave

20 Hertz Sine Wave Response

This is a 20 Hertz Sine Wave:

Keep this in mind, that these are 'Speaker' measurements, not 'Amplifier' measurements. This is an actual Acoustic Response at 20 Hertz. Impressed? The above was taken nearfield and the V scale on the left is the actual output voltage of the Test Microphone. The distortion is hardly noticeable and the wave form is wonderfully clean. No sign of any doubling (where the driver outputs at twice the frequency i.e. 40 Hertz).

This is the FFT Spectral Distortion Measurement based on 40 Hertz:

Total THD of Critical Q Sub is 0.6% approx.

This shows the second harmonic 80Hz distortion is - 48 dB, that's 0.4%. The third harmonic (120Hz) distortion is - 61 dB, about 0.1% distortion. All harmonics above that are less than 0.1%. Total THD is approx. 0.6%. This is a very credible performance (almost incredible), again easily matching Servo Subs.

The next example is a certain 'famous brand' Sub:

 

Total THD is 1.2% compared to Critical Q Sub's 0.6% - this is no typo!

As a comparison this is a similar test, based on 40Hz, on a highly respected Sub made by what some consider the premier maker of Servo-Controlled Subs. This highly spec'ed Sub measured - 42 dB at the 2nd harmonic 80Hz, about 0.8%. This is considered a good result - and it should be as it is Servo-Controlled. But notice: The higher order distortion is a lot higher, the 3rd harmonic is about 0.3%. I don't think this is as good a result  The 3rd harmonic in our Critical Q Sub of is less than 0.1% and the 4th is also under 0.1%. So our Project is actually superior here.

Incidentally, when the total THD figure is taken into account, our Critical Q Sub is 0.6%, whereas our commercial Servo Sub measures 1.2%, no doubt due to the higher harmonic distortion.

You can build our Project Sub for about a quarter of the price. This proves conclusively that we are easily attaining the performance of a high quality Servo-Controlled Sub. I assure you that is sounds every bit as good as it measures.

Conclusions

We have results here that shows conclusively that our aim has been achieved, not just near enough but every bit as good. This I believe is a landmark design.

I have been asked why this has not been attempted before. Two reasons, such Low Q isn't considered conventional, because it's a very lossy alignment. There has been a few rare commercial full range speaker designs that have used Critical Q alignments, and while they are very clean in the bass (very low distortion and the best transient response of any box alignment) they also tend to be rather dry sounding . But this is more likely because of premature roll-off when the Fb is about 50Hz or higher, and hence lack of extension. We need an Fb of no more than 40Hz.

This comes to our second reason: Finding a suitable driver. This superior Peerless driver gives us an Fb of 39Hz. It is not exposed to premature roll-off as it is used as a Sub and it's the Sub Plate amplifier that controls the level of the Sub. The lossy nature is also now negated by the high power amplifier and the superior power handling of the chosen driver. What we are left with is the very desirable low distortion, the incredible damping and transient speed of a Critically Q Sub-Woofer.

 

Send mail to joeras@vacuumstate.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2003-10 Joe Rasmussen & JLTi
Last modified: Sunday June 07, 2015

Just had a terrible thought. If "intelligent design" is unscientific, then who will design our audio equipment?